Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 14:03

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ending Parole for 500,000 Migrants Creates New Headaches for Employers - WSJ
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Can Benadryl cause a false positive for benzodiazepines?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Texas public health departments brace for another $119 million in federal cuts - The Texas Tribune
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Heart in distress? 9 silent symptoms you shouldn’t overlook - Times of India
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What ended your relationship with your best friend?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is anyone up to have a little conversation?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do I cope with the fact that I will never have a girlfriend?